Equality is not hard, just provide freedom!
November 24, 2009
I’m sort of surprised the same sex marriage conversations are not evolving more quickly. The long and short of it (to me) is this:
- We still (sort of) live in a free country. Government should not be denying anyone rights; we all agree on that.
- Marriage is a sticky word – lots of religious folks want to protect it’s definition.
To me, the solution is so obvious I’m surprised we’re still talking about it. I would love for someone to give me some real reasons with my solution explained in detail here (link) does not work for both sides.
In summary, here’s the solution: Privitise Marriage. Get the government out of the conversation all together (State and Federal). This would restore freedom to marriage. This can be done a number of ways; here are two suggestions.
- Re-write the current government marriage documents and exclude the word marriage. Write them so that they can be used in any combination.
- Remove the current marriage documents and don’t replace them with anything – get the government away from marriage. We really should not need the government’s permission to get married. I understand marriage is related to property but there are other, smarter ways around that.
IT WOULD WORK, RIGHT?
For the folks in favor of same sex marriage:
- Equality is achieved.
- Federal and State documents ether don’t exist, or are identical regardless if the union is same sex, or opposite sex. The word “marriage” does not exist in government documents.
- Religious organizations have the freedom (regardless of what state they are in) to perform same sex marriages, or not perform same sex marriages thus respecting their religious freedom.
- Same sex couples can choose to get married at the places that choose to perform the ceremony. It can be called anything in the world. Party, marriage, celebration, union, lemon, whatever.
For the folks who do not support same sex marriage:
- Marriage is protected, and can be defined by your specific religious organization.
- Marriage is no longer a government word, and it’s name or definition will not be changed by the government.
- Religious organizations exist that do not allow same sex marriages which are an option for membership.
BUT WHAT WOULD SCHOOLS TEACH?
Because marraige would no longer be a federal or state issue, marriage would not come up in the classroom at all. The only thing they could really teach would be the legal documents that replace the old marriage documents (if they even need to exist) but I don’t think schools would waste valuable time teaching that. What would they teach… where to fill in the names? As there is no lesson on W-10’s or other government forms I’m sure the new union documents would be left out of the classroom.
OK folks, so let me have it. How does this not resolve the issue…?
-dm